Lorelei's Deck

• Snap Dragon × 1 (Custom)
  
• Mystic Treant × 1 (Custom)
  
• Greenhouse × 2 (Custom)
  
• Photosynthesis × 1 (Custom)
  
• Hedge Trimmer × 1 (Custom)
  
• Harvest Season × 1 (Custom)
  
• Thorned Predicament × 2 (Custom)
  
• Tamriel, Patron Saint of the Harvest × 2 (Custom)

DECK DATA WITHHELD

So, a plant type deck....if you want, I can help you with it.

Ryu Kuze wrote:

So, a plant type deck....if you want, I can help you with it.

I'm adding in custom cards, so I'm not sure if that will work. But if you want to help give me an idea of what cards to fit in there, I'd be glad to accept help.

Natalya wrote:

Ryu Kuze wrote:

So, a plant type deck....if you want, I can help you with it.

I'm adding in custom cards, so I'm not sure if that will work. But if you want to help give me an idea of what cards to fit in there, I'd be glad to accept help.

What is going to be your main strategy in this deck?

Ryu Kuze wrote:

Natalya wrote:

Ryu Kuze wrote:

So, a plant type deck....if you want, I can help you with it.

I'm adding in custom cards, so I'm not sure if that will work. But if you want to help give me an idea of what cards to fit in there, I'd be glad to accept help.

What is going to be your main strategy in this deck?

Sorry I didn't read this earlier, but I've already taken initiative and built a deck using several custom cards in it. I didn't mean to waste your time (But at least you didn't go through the trouble of building a deck already, right?).

Anyway, if you look at my cards you'll find out the main strategy. Most of it is deadlocking the opponent.

Personally, I'm going to ask...

Why are you steering away from the Plant structure, (notices Brionac) when you can just make a custom to replace him and still keep the theme?

Ryu Kuze wrote:

Personally, I'm going to ask...

Why are you steering away from the Plant structure, (notices Brionac) when you can just make a custom to replace him and still keep the theme?

... Because I don't feel like it. Don't ask stupid questions. >.<

Natalya wrote:

Ryu Kuze wrote:

Personally, I'm going to ask...

Why are you steering away from the Plant structure, (notices Brionac) when you can just make a custom to replace him and still keep the theme?

... Because I don't feel like it. Don't ask stupid questions. >.<

The only reason why I'm asking is so that you don't be rejected by either Link or me. I'm doing you a favor by asking these questions and treat you with some respect. Since, we don't want typical decks on here (Brionac splashed into a Plant Deck does count since that's a typical -way- to go (For example: Oh, Yu-gi-oh RP? Let's run Blackwings. (Black Feathers))) Then everyone would flood in with these type of Decks and essentially ruining the RP. Personally, if you want that card in, I suggest making a Created Card of it.

We take everything into consideration when we analyze who gets in and who doesn't. Just take my advice.

I'm requesting moderators and admins to see this and see if it's acceptable in the RP. Link obviously has the final say, because it's his RP.

NOTE: Please note that I'm trying to respect you and others by asking these questions and commenting in this section. I'm always paying much attention to this section, so if you need anything, ask.

*sigh* I'm with Ryu on this matter. Natalya, Decks in a RP are -supposed- to be creative and original, sure you can use RL cards and all but of course there's a limit and a line that has to be drawn. Using Brionac in a Plant Deck probably seems like a reasonable thing to you but think of it this way if you would.

If you were in a Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's RP playing as Aki, do you think she would have Brionac in her Deck? I don't think she would personally (since all she uses is Black Rose Dragon). The point I am exaggerating and also trying to make is, stick to one archetype. If you mix cards around then the Deck wont have personality and will just be a variant of the RL Decks we see today (I.E. Monarch, Zombies, etc etc).

Also we're not saying you have to take apart your whole deck, just take out Brionac so we can all be on the same page and not bicker about this anymore, or make a Plant Version of Brionac so you can be happy too.

Either way, I am not allowing you to use Brionac in that Deck, it just conflicts with the Originality of the Deck (it would be like if you were to use Zombiecarrier [Plaguespreader Zombie] or Black Feather - Gale the Whirlwind [Blackwing - Gale of the Hurricane]).

Link wrote:

*sigh* I'm with Ryu on this matter. Natalya, Decks in a RP are -supposed- to be creative and original, sure you can use RL cards and all but of course there's a limit and a line that has to be drawn. Using Brionac in a Plant Deck probably seems like a reasonable thing to you but think of it this way if you would.

If you were in a Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's RP playing as Aki, do you think she would have Brionac in her Deck? I don't think she would personally (since all she uses is Black Rose Dragon). The point I am exaggerating and also trying to make is, stick to one archetype. If you mix cards around then the Deck wont have personality and will just be a variant of the RL Decks we see today (I.E. Monarch, Zombies, etc etc).

Also we're not saying you have to take apart your whole deck, just take out Brionac so we can all be on the same page and not bicker about this anymore, or make a Plant Version of Brionac so you can be happy too.

Either way, I am not allowing you to use Brionac in that Deck, it just conflicts with the Originality of the Deck (it would be like if you were to use Zombiecarrier [Plaguespreader Zombie] or Black Feather - Gale the Whirlwind [Blackwing - Gale of the Hurricane]).

I'm already working on a Plant-type version of that card, but then-- (EDITED OUT BECAUSE I DON'T WANT PEOPLE EXPLOITING MY STUPIDITY LOLZ).

EDIT: Is it okay if I make the World Tree's "Flower Counters" instead "Plant Counters" since that's what I named the counters in my deck?

... I don't mean to double-post and I apologize if I'm breaking such a rule, but I was serious about what I said in my edit if you had read it and assumed it was irrelevant. If you did not read it, well now I'm trying to get you to.

The question was: "Is it okay if I make the World Tree's "Flower Counters" instead "Plant Counters" since that's what I named the counters in my deck?"

Natalya wrote:

... I don't mean to double-post and I apologize if I'm breaking such a rule, but I was serious about what I said in my edit if you had read it and assumed it was irrelevant. If you did not read it, well now I'm trying to get you to.

The question was: "Is it okay if I make the World Tree's "Flower Counters" instead "Plant Counters" since that's what I named the counters in my deck?"

1) I quadrupled-post at one time, so it's obviously alright for people to double-post.

2) Run it by Link. If it's me, I would say "Make a card that changes "Plant Counters" to "Flower Counters", but in the long run, it's just not worth it. So, I'll just say ask Link via PM.

I'm going to change Harvest Season's effect since I find it to be a glorified Pot of Greed.

I'm planning to renovate this deck heavily for the new RP. Its theme may even completely change. I'm considering using a Psychic-type deck.

Natalya wrote:

I'm planning to renovate this deck heavily for the new RP. Its theme may even completely change. I'm considering using a Psychic-type deck.

Feel free to make a new thread about it. I'm not enforcing the "Oh, 1 person, 1 thread" rule anymore.

Ryu Kuze wrote:

Natalya wrote:

I'm planning to renovate this deck heavily for the new RP. Its theme may even completely change. I'm considering using a Psychic-type deck.

Feel free to make a new thread about it. I'm not enforcing the "Oh, 1 person, 1 thread" rule anymore.

Seems kind of late for that. I wasn't even aware of that rule. Stupid me.

Natalya wrote:

Ryu Kuze wrote:

Natalya wrote:

I'm planning to renovate this deck heavily for the new RP. Its theme may even completely change. I'm considering using a Psychic-type deck.

Feel free to make a new thread about it. I'm not enforcing the "Oh, 1 person, 1 thread" rule anymore.

Seems kind of late for that. I wasn't even aware of that rule. Stupid me.

It was a Link rule. I've just decided to throw that one out the window.